CalendarCalendar   Photos  * FAQ
It is currently Tue Nov 25, 2014 3:44 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 24 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: A new line of lightweight Red Labels?
PostPosted: Thu Jan 05, 2012 10:47 pm 
Field Grade

Joined: Sat Jul 10, 2010 8:08 pm
Posts: 43
They aren't listed in the 2012 Catalogue.




Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: A new line of lightweight Red Labels?
PostPosted: Sun Jan 08, 2012 5:31 pm 
*Proud to be a*
*Proud to be a*

Joined: Thu Oct 09, 2003 4:31 pm
Posts: 1783
Location: Virginia
Since it appears they've stopped making 'em, we Red Label owners can jack up the price. I'm not selling mine, though.

Dan


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: A new line of lightweight Red Labels?
PostPosted: Sun Jan 08, 2012 10:22 pm 
Shooting Instructor
Shooting Instructor

Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2005 2:12 pm
Posts: 4172
Location: Artesia, NM
Neither am I - unless someone offers me a ridiculous price for it!

_________________
Like the 28 Gauge?

Check out the 28 Ga Society! Copy/paste into your URL window:

28gasociety.46.forum er.com

Delete the space between "forum" and "er", and hit the "Enter" key. SGW's softer buggers direct links.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: A new line of lightweight Red Labels?
PostPosted: Wed Jan 18, 2012 9:27 am 
Crown Grade

Joined: Fri May 09, 2008 9:17 pm
Posts: 2132
Location: Land of Oz
FX4 wrote:
What I would really like to see in the RRL line is a lighter weight field guns and a true commitment to range guns. Get rid of the auto safety, 32" barrels, nice high grade scroll work, lengthened forcing cones and guns designed for trap, skeet, and sporting clays. It seems to me everything I have read the recent guns are top notch quality so now it's a matter of making task specific guns in this age of specialization.

I pretty much agree with that....with the exception of the lighter weight field gun. I felt the current (now non-current) Red Labels were light enough for upland work. They are/were TOO light for waterfowl or real target work.
Ruger doesn't need a lighter O/U, it needs a heavier one.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 24 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Registered users: 500sks, AdsBot [Google], albanygun, analyst, Ariss, Bailey Boat, Bing [Bot], btktwood, catsmeow, Chris Ferres, claysmoker, Curly-Nohair, dale195700, DallasCMT, David W, E Rex B, etech69, FreeShot, Ga. Skeet, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Google Feedfetcher, Granpooba, hawglips, hopper810, ithacanut, jeffrey harvey, Jim18611865, JohnfromUK, jstone01, la angler, Mike Noel, mike orlen, MikeTX, mka2278, Mule Driver, n6yga, nevtrapper, nsfwfor, rmiddlemas, sauer16, sera, Shotgun Steve, simsy9, Snotrub, StevenTate, strut64, summitsprings, TrapSince91, TuJays, turch, WhyMe, Yahoo [Bot]


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group     -  DMCA Notice