mbedit wrote:
that may be a good question to ask them... if they need 50 or so that might be doable, and I know I have at least a dozen laying around here I could donate.
What I did a couple pages back was use the MEC bushing charts to help ID candidate powders that are with-in the range of published loads. In other-words, the bushing determines the volume needed with other components to get a good stackup so you don't need to monkey around with cherrios or overshot cards. Its about finding a "bulky" powder rather than adding more grains. Pro-Reach just wasn't a good match when looking at the data, but it doesn't mean its not perfectly acceptable in tapered hulls like WWAAs.
Yes, I was off topic, or Rio hulls.
I use and like ProReach because it is virtually perfect for AA HS hulls.
One of the lowest pressure, but highest velocity for that pressure, along with good fit.
Never got into hunting anyting larger than a few pheasents with the 28, but it looks like you guys are on to something with your specialized loads.
Not really into waterfowl, and between age and lack of wild pheasants today, it looks like that has virtually came to an end. (The 4 knee replacements complained a bunch during 4 days of real slim phesant hunting this year) The wobble skeet and trap fields are much less hard on them.