It is currently Mon Jun 18, 2018 6:35 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 68 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Remington V3 review shot beside a Benelli Super Vinci
PostPosted: Mon Jun 11, 2018 1:01 pm 
Shotgun Expert
Shotgun Expert
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 09, 2006 11:02 am
Posts: 22414
Location: Plainfield, IL
hkg3k wrote:
Based on other statements you've made which don't stand up to technical scrutiny...I seriously doubt the veracity of this statement.


Quote:
Physics would predict the spring loaded valves would be superior for controlling bolt speed because the valves control/regulate the pressure in the Versaport cylinders and thus the energy transferred to the bolt


Only in an alternative universe. A a pop-off valve has nothing to do with the chamber at all.

You don't have a clue. You're ignorant of the extensive Remington lab results. No wonder you need a fake name.

Captain Obvious knows that I was having a discussion with fblainen11, Tidefanatic, and Roadman long before you injected yourself into this thread and derailed it. If you actually had any significant experience with a V3 walnut, you would have saved yourself your perpetual flailing and self-embarrassment.



_________________
--Randy

http://randywakeman.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Remington V3 review shot beside a Benelli Super Vinci
PostPosted: Mon Jun 11, 2018 1:56 pm 
Tournament Grade
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 27, 2005 10:34 am
Posts: 134
RandyWakeman wrote:
Only in an alternative universe. A a pop-off valve has nothing to do with the chamber at all.

You don't have a clue. You're obnoxious, argumentative, and ignorant of the extensive Remington lab results. No wonder you need a fake name.

Captain Obvious knows that I was having a discussion with fblainen11, Tidefanatic, and Roadman long before you injected yourself into this thread and derailed it. If you actually had any significant experience with a V3 walnut, you would have saved yourself your perpetual flailing and self-embarrassment.


The Emperor has no clothes. But hey...at least you dropped the "tubes are more linear" mantra. :lol:

_________________
hkg3k
Browning, Maxim, Vickers
Beltfeds: Real Machine Guns


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Remington V3 review shot beside a Benelli Super Vinci
PostPosted: Mon Jun 11, 2018 5:07 pm 
Field Grade

Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2018 2:19 pm
Posts: 74
RW, please drop the ad hominem tack as that is doing you no benefit.

When in a pit on your own digging......stop digging.


Last edited by mea culpa on Mon Jun 11, 2018 5:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Remington V3 review shot beside a Benelli Super Vinci
PostPosted: Mon Jun 11, 2018 5:09 pm 
Field Grade

Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2018 2:19 pm
Posts: 74
RandyWakeman wrote:
hkg3k wrote:
Based on other statements you've made which don't stand up to technical scrutiny...I seriously doubt the veracity of this statement.


Quote:
Physics would predict the spring loaded valves would be superior for controlling bolt speed because the valves control/regulate the pressure in the Versaport cylinders and thus the energy transferred to the bolt


Only in an alternative universe. A a pop-off valve has nothing to do with the chamber at all.

You don't have a clue. You're obnoxious, argumentative, and ignorant of the extensive Remington lab results. No wonder you need a fake name.

Captain Obvious knows that I was having a discussion with fblainen11, Tidefanatic, and Roadman long before you injected yourself into this thread and derailed it. If you actually had any significant experience with a V3 walnut, you would have saved yourself your perpetual flailing and self-embarrassment.


Do you have a problem with these fake names?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Remington V3 review shot beside a Benelli Super Vinci
PostPosted: Mon Jun 11, 2018 6:28 pm 
Presentation Grade
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2008 4:15 pm
Posts: 793
Location: Caledon, Ontario Canada
Man this thread is getting stupid! My V3 works great. Bought it largely due to Randy’s reviews. Couldn’t be happier.
Thanks man

_________________
17 Browning Cynergy MOSGB
16 Remington V3 MOSGB
15 Excalibur Micro 335
13 Savage Bmag 17wsm (for sale)
13 Remington XCR2 270
12 Kel-tec sub 2000 9mm


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Remington V3 review shot beside a Benelli Super Vinci
PostPosted: Mon Jun 11, 2018 7:21 pm 
Field Grade

Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2018 2:19 pm
Posts: 74
IMO, the thread evolved as many others have with technical aspects of the VM/V3 gas systems being examined. One party made statements that could not be validated, then a personal attack ensued. That's when all civil discourse and spirited debate died.

It's a shame that happened as valuable information was being disseminated.

Is this venue all about cheerleading for a particular product and carrying water for those waving the Pom Poms or is it something more?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Remington V3 review shot beside a Benelli Super Vinci
PostPosted: Mon Jun 11, 2018 9:23 pm 
Shotgun Expert
Shotgun Expert
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 09, 2006 11:02 am
Posts: 22414
Location: Plainfield, IL
kuffs06 wrote:
Man this thread is getting stupid! My V3 works great. Bought it largely due to Randy’s reviews. Couldn’t be happier.
Thanks man


Getting? :shock:

For those that are addicted to the original system, you're in luck. They are in stock and for sale, and they aren't expensive. Buy two, buy three, buy a dozen if that makes your heart go pitter-patter.

As for new models, if you think you know something that Remington does not, you can of course contact them directly and unleash your gushing fountain of newfound semi-psychic wisdom upon them. They are the ones making them, after all.

_________________
--Randy

http://randywakeman.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Remington V3 review shot beside a Benelli Super Vinci
PostPosted: Mon Jun 11, 2018 9:52 pm 
Field Grade

Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2018 2:19 pm
Posts: 74
Wonder if Remington's future ownership will continue the VM/V3 models. After all, they are the poster child for a grand company that totally collapsed while in the midst of a record firearms sales era.

People quit buying their products during this period, period and that's why Big Green failed. The new owners may well decide to clean house with the product that represents a vestige of failure. Wouldn't it be novel to go back to the products (i.e. Wingmaster 870) that made them a household name (instead of Class Action lawsuits). As coach Bryant would say, "dance with who brought you".




Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 68 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Registered users: 687shooter, 737Mech, Basstar, bigbluedodge, Bing [Bot], Bladeswitcher, BobK, browning725guy, casonet, cbradford, Chris Ferres, ChrisRR, chrisyews, cptnball, Darkhorse60, dcblvsh2, dgrebel, DLC1951, dmarbell, duckqwacker, DUKFVR, federal, FreeShot, gearguywb, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Google Feedfetcher, hankd, HeneryHawk, hopper810, Jim18611865, JonnyRocket, kevinb12062, KRIEGHOFFK80, labloverva, leonidas, ljusuperx, maggs01, max harris, Medic911, mike orlen, nhithaca, old 12, Oldsalt, oneounceload, PKW-Indiana, railroad, Raul Perez, raymond525, Rebel Sympathy, rjm0430, rkrcpa, rodfly, rosiesdad, sand9229, SDV, seb7515, Setter Home, Steve Y, Supervet, Tidefanatic, Tokamecotom, Tomfowl, Turpentine1, WAGinVA, Waldyo, zig


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Jump to:  
© 2017 Carbon Media Group Outdoors    - DMCA Notice