Hello,
I picked up a Model 12 Field for a Ben and a Ulysses, plus tax, this year. I got it this cheap as it had some notable pitting on the right side of the receiver, and one or two other spots on barrel/mag tube- but not significant anywhere else. It was missing an ejector and the action seemed rusted shut, but it wasn't.
I have removed and killed the rust [acidic rust treatment after removal], and then used some cold-bluing, but I am not thrilled with the look. I also replaced the ejector and detail stripped/cleaned the action, plus replaced the seized safety with a Winchester oversized one.
I am debating what to do for refinishing, but I want to keep the price as low as possible, as I have spent a total of under $225 on it so far. [don't worry- I made up for that on other purchases, where I paid over the normal price.]
I have a guy I trust to reblue the shotgun, but it would require shipping it half-way across the country.
I have another guy I trust to do great CeraKote work on anything [he's done 4 handguns, and some motorcycle parts for me], and I can drop it off at his house.
I plan on doing the detail strip before dropping it off with whomever does the work. I've detail stripped the Model 12 a few times, so this is not a big deal. The trigger group is irritating, but no biggie.
When shipping is factored in, the matte bluing would cost me around $100 more than a cerakote finish.
Since the pitting takes this out of the realm of collectible, and the pits are deep enough that I don't want that side of the receiver planed to 1/2 its thickness to remove all trace of pits, I am considering the cerakote for this shotgun.
Do any of you have any functional/performance reasons to pick bluing instead of ceraKote?
I am familiar with the aesthetic reasons and the tradition, but don't know if cerakote creates problems for the Model 12.
What are your thoughts?