Shotgun Forum banner
41 - 49 of 49 Posts
So far everyone that's seeing this is using Winchester HS hulls. I don't. Currently in the middle of a garage audition so it will be a little while before really digging into the issue. I am thinking they are damaging the powder cup somehow.
 
Yep, who cares if pattern isn't blown. I would have gone to the pattern board before ever posting about this if I wasn't happy with the breaks on the clay field. If bloopers then we have a problem. I tried one wad from DR and it sucked, sorry but won't buy anymore from them. Claybuster makes good wads.
 
There's a reason. Its not just the recovered wads. Inconsistent velocities,poor brakes on targets. This is an issue for some. If you don't good for you. Guys that used straight walled hulls and claybuster wads had a similar issue some time back. Wads looked very much like the ones OP posted. The fix was Gualandi wads instead of claybuster. Powder was migrating past the powder cup.
 
Discussion starter · #46 ·
Who cares what the wad looks like after it had been fired? It was in an explosion in the gun barrel. Don't worry about it. :)
Having the gas ring seal ripped off and allowing gas to escape from around the base of the wad tends to result in a poor performing shot shell. I don’t know what your motivation is for reloading but a big part of my motivation is to produce well performing, quality shot shells. Also, curiosity leads to knowledge. I’m curious and I like to know how things work. Feel free to continue being un-curious.
 
The higher charge weight of PP made a significant difference. With the lower charge weight every single recovered wad had the powder cup obturating ring either partially ripped off of completely ripped off. Now, with the higher charge weight, only one out of ten recovered wads had a partial rip and another 4 had only slight signs of the beginning of a rip. See pics below. The comparable loads with Clays had zero wads with even a slight sign of ripping. Every Clays wad recovered was in pristine condition (other than the normal/usual wear/tear). The wads for both sets of loads came out of the same 500 ct. bag.

Any/all thoughts welcomed. At this point, I'm leaning towards a theory that lower charges of Perfect Pattern are the culprit - although I have no idea why.
Your PP loads that puncture the DR wads are minimum pressure loads. Larger powder drops mostly eliminated the problem with the punctures and torn skirts. Any chance the skirt is not sealing well to the hull wall or the (dirty) bore, letting either some powder or even combustion gasses get up into the cushion section of the wad? You may just have to reserve the DR wads for your 1200 FPS + loads. Could be that Hodgdon techs don't do enough testing with DR wads to know if they fail like this at lower pressure ranges....
good luck, garrisonjoe
 
Discussion starter · #48 ·
For anyone interested/following along... latest update - yesterday I tested 10 rounds with 15.3 gr. Perfect Pattern in once fired Rem. STS hulls with Cheddite primers, 1 oz of #7 1/2 shot and Claybuster CB4100-12B wads. I recovered 8 out of 10 wads and they all looked great. Except for a few crazy velocity readings from my Chrony (1800 - 2000 fps which I excluded), avg velocity was 1246 with an ES of 52. This is from a 32" Browning BT99. Earlier I tested a similar load but with DR-RT12 wads and those looked good also.

While this is not by any means an exhaustive comparison, I've come to the conclusion (for my purposes only) that Perfect Pattern when used in 7/8 oz loads, generally results in wad burn thru of some form or another. On the other hand, comparable 1 oz loads show no such abnormalities. I wish I could get to the bottom of what's happening with my 7/8 oz loads but for now I'll just accept that Perfect Pattern is not my powder of choice for 7/8 oz loads.
 
For anyone interested/following along... latest update - yesterday I tested 10 rounds with 15.3 gr. Perfect Pattern in once fired Rem. STS hulls with Cheddite primers, 1 oz of #7 1/2 shot and Claybuster CB4100-12B wads. I recovered 8 out of 10 wads and they all looked great. Except for a few crazy velocity readings from my Chrony (1800 - 2000 fps which I excluded), avg velocity was 1246 with an ES of 52. This is from a 32" Browning BT99. Earlier I tested a similar load but with DR-RT12 wads and those looked good also.

While this is not by any means an exhaustive comparison, I've come to the conclusion (for my purposes only) that Perfect Pattern when used in 7/8 oz loads, generally results in wad burn thru of some form or another. On the other hand, comparable 1 oz loads show no such abnormalities. I wish I could get to the bottom of what's happening with my 7/8 oz loads but for now I'll just accept that Perfect Pattern is not my powder of choice for 7/8 oz loads.

An ES of 52? Not good. That is well beyond a decent target load. If you have target loads that aren't well under an ES of 35 FPS. Find another load.
 
41 - 49 of 49 Posts