Joined
·
312 Posts
First time I saw this,
enjoy:
enjoy:
Agreed. They claim it can be fired from a HMMWV. Well so can an M2, but it isn't exactly ergonomic. The individual soldier is going to be limited on the number of mags that can be carried simply on the bulk of the mags.Banshee said:I don't think the AA-12 will ever go to far. It is too big and bulky.
It doesn't. The XM29 was a 20mm grenade launcher. All kinds of super trooper stuff. And it was pretty much left to wither. Part of the reason was that a 20mm GL just isn't that impressive. And those rounds were intended to do a lot more than the 12ga HE rounds.sjohnny said:How isn't the void for something that makes an 18' shrapnel area filled by the MK 19?
I have no doubt that they might have some utility. And the safety certification is one step in the process; it can have that certification but that does not in itself indicate that it should be fielded.wfb18 said:m24shooter and sjohnny, I will call Mr. Randy Aukamp of Action Manufacturing Company of Pennsylvania again next week. He was very nice to me when I called him earlier this week. I will ask Mr. Aukamp if the Marine Corps War Fighting Lab has completed the safety certification of the FRAG 12. Also, I will ask him if he would like to comment on whether or not the Marine Corps anticipates ordering many of the FRAG 12's, and if so, how has the Marine Corps evaluated the usefulness of the FRAG 12's in combat, considering our other more powerful grenade launchers.
Then one is left to wonder why he didn't. I'm sure that at least part of that is the possibility of ATFE slapping a DD on it.Mr. Babar could have instead sold it to the public as a semi-automatic shotgun.
Couldn't he get around that with the correct paperwork/licensing/incorporation? Otherwise how are other arms manufacturers able to produce/develop arms? It seems that LWRC, Colt, Barrett, and others have been able to produce automatic weapons in the last 23 years.Mr. Babar himself cannot even own or stock or transfer any AA-12's due to the 1986 federal law banning the transfer to civilians of imported or domestically manufactured machine guns made after 19 May 1986.
And I'm sure the fact that he bought the rights to the thing have no bearing on that. Not doubting his patriotism or anything else, but businessmen tend to be in business for a reason.It seems to me that Mr. Babar has an all or nothing determination to get the AA-12 accepted by the military procurement system because he is a true American patriot and he wants to save American lives.
I'm sure they work well together. I'm sure they are very effective in their roles, and in some circumstances there is nothing that could come close if it works properly. I'm just saying that it is still a shotgun, and suffers from some of the same limitations that relegate the shotgun to a narrow field of use.And he genuinely believes that the AA-12 and the FRAG 12's were made for each other.
The only way I want that to happen is if it works as claimed, it serves a useful purpose, and the military wants it.I hope that Mr. Babar realizes his dream of getting his AA-12's in the hands of American soldiers.
That means almost nothing to me. I do believe that the vehicle mount is about the best use for it, so long as it has a large ammunition feed device. But just because Blackwater hosts a video of something doesn't mean it is a critical item.I think that Blackwater admires Mr. Babar too. Blackwater uploaded the video to YouTube.
That's not the name of the company anymore....Blackwater
I've read it is now "Xe"{TEX}Hawaii 5-0 said:That's not the name of the company anymore....Blackwater
That's correct. A bunch of bad press and losing your contract with the government will cause you to change names.{TEX}Hawaii 5-0 wrote:
Quote:
Blackwater
That's not the name of the company anymore....
I've read it is now "Xe"
We have tens of thousands of Benelli M1014 Combat shotguns, and Remington M870 and Mossberg 500/590 shotguns in service that are far less effective than the AA-12. There are twenty AA-12's being evaluated right now by various military operations. But replacing pump and semi-automatic shotguns was never what I thought could be replaced or supplemented by the fully automatic AA-12 -- it is the M249 SAW. Before anyone bursts a vein, read below and consider the current efforts by the Marine Corps and the Army to reduce the weight of the SAW, and that the M249's sustained rate of fire is only 85 rounds per minute. The requirement for the IAR calls for the weapon to fire 36 rounds per minute for 16 minutes, 40 seconds. The IAR also will be able to fire at a higher rate of 75 rounds per minute for eight minutes.wfb18 said:Baber has ...a remote-control mini-helicopter called the AutoCopter, which holds two AA-12's and can carry the robots into battle... "It delivers the lead equivalent of 132 M16s," says Baber.
*************
A weapon that will fire 20 x #4 Buckshot 12 gauge shells in 4 seconds while spraying 540 .24 caliber pellets is bringing the smoke.
*************
The AA12 CQB model with the 13" barrel has the same 33" length as the M4 wth stock extended, and it weighs 10 pounds. That is not too bulky for a weapon that fires 180 "00" buckshot pellets in 4 seconds.
*************
Jerry Babar said, "Once you see the AA12 one time, then you understand that it is probably the most powerful firearm in the world. There is no way that anybody within 200 yards can face this weapon and survive it. He just cannot do it. There's just so much lead delivery on target, that it's just destroying everything in its path."
I have read somewhere on this forum that very few infantry CQB shots are kill shots past 100 yards. The AA-12 is accurate to 175 meters with the FRAG 12's and good sights. (I am not stepping on that EOTech/Aimpoint/Trijicon mine again.) Because the AA-12 has 10% of the recoil of other shotguns, and virtually no muzzle rise, it can fire a stream of 20 FRAG 12's through a window of that building down the street faster than calling the BGs cell phone number.m24shooter said:First, it doesn't have the range. It is still a shotgun, shooting shotgun rounds. You mention it being used in a CQB role. What happens when your team steps outside is now back on the 100-300 yard battlefield? What about taking fire from a building down the street? Are the shotgun users going to have to carry a SAW too?
I am always referring to the sustained rate of fire that the weapons can operate at without barrel failure or without cooking off a round in the chamber. All parts in the AA-12 are beefed up stainless steel and no rate of fire has yet caused barrel failure. The M249's sustained rate of fire is only 85 rounds per minute. The requirement for the IAR calls for the weapon to fire 36 rounds per minute for 16 minutes, 40 seconds. The IAR also will be able to fire at a higher rate of 75 rounds per minute for eight minutes.m24shooter said:Second, you seem somewhat awed at the ROF and amount of projos going downrange. As I have stated before, in order to support that ROF the troop is going to have to carry an insane amount of ammo in bulky, heavy magazines. And he's going to be spending a lot of time reloading. Actually, he probably won't in the real world if the hype is followed: he'll run out of ammo very quickly. Your statement that it is more sustainable is completely wrong.
Using the right tool for the right job, hardened slugs should match up with black tipped armor piercing M995 5.56mm ammunition.m24shooter said:Third, armor penetration. How well does #4 buck penetrate armor?
Using the right tool for the right job, the armor piercing version of the FRAG 12 grenade would be used, and black tipped M995 5.56mm ammunition is weak in comparison.m24shooter said:Fourth, barrier penetration. How well does #4 penetrate car doors, auto glass, or light cover?
Let's go up to slugs. Let's go up to FRAG 12's.m24shooter said:Fifth, terminal ballistics. How does #4 compare to 5.56 at ranges beyond 25-30 yards? Let's go up to 00. How does it compare?
Agreed. The AA-12 will never, ever be used as a breacher shotgun or for mundane use. The AA-12 offers a higher volume of suppression fire than the SAW and it weighs 7 pounds less than the SAW. A 20-shell drum weighs the same as a 200 round SAW belt, but the 20-shell drum has 33% more projectile weight than the belt has, and it can be fired in 4 seconds versus 2.3 minutes for the belt when fired at 85 rounds per minute. And the AA-12 barrel never needs changing from overheating!m24shooter said:Sixth, you say the AA12 would be far more effective than the current inventory of shotguns. For the purposes that they are currently used for, I would say not really. The current inventory does the job just fine: they are a narrow niche use weapon. In fact, the AA12 may not even be as effective in breaching and LL use.
Agreed. The M249 weighs 22 pounds when loaded with a 200 round belt. The IAR will weigh 12.5 pounds unloaded using 2-pound, 30-round magazines, but the IAR has no barrel changes to overcome heat and so it has to fire more slowly than the SAW. The 10 pound AA-12 with a 5-pound loaded drum is a far better option for the Marine Corps than the IAR. And as I wrote, perhaps fireteams could use the AA-12 to supplement the SAW, rather than replace it.m24shooter said:The IAR is a totally different concept and I think the Marines will end up re-learning the lessons of the BAR all over again.