This discussion has gone round and round, but if we can assume that the Dickinsons will have a similar reputation as the Huglus (if not better), than I would not hesitate to recommend one new. I am not claiming that it is as good as a high-end shotgun, but if a guy is looking for a new, good quality, beautiful upland gun that handles nicely, I would look no further than a Dickinson. Here's why:
I got my first experience in a Cabela's yesterday and had the opportunity to handle a number of guns. While I didn't actually put them all side by side, I did handle them successively. Another first was handling a Grulla 217 round body, Arrieta 578 and AyA #2 round body. I'm a Spanish gun lover and it was quite a thrilling experience so my giddiness may have gotten the best of me. I wish I could have taken them all out and tried them, I don't think I was objective. I have an AyA XXV box lock, another Spanish gun of fine quality (Mendicute) and a number of "bargain fixer-upers" so I have some experience in this realm (though I make no claim to being an expert).
Why do I mention all of this? I also handled a Dickinson 12 ga. and was blown away. I also have a CZ Partridge 12 ga. and the difference is remarkable. The Huglus are medium/heavy game guns. The Dickinson is clearly a light game gun. Not as light as my XXV, but still a gun I could carry all day in the field. It is in a much higher class than the Huglus. I wish I could have spent more time with it to compare, but it felt like a very nice double in the hands. The fit and finish were also very nice.
If I were in the market for a new gun, I know what I would be buying next. If Cabela's paid attention to the market, they could advertise in all the upland magazines, do a media blitz with this thing and sell a bucketload of them. I can't think of another gun of this quality that comes in at this price point. I'd be real interested to do a field test of an Ugartechea grade I and a Dickinson.
MD