I'm fairly new to trap shooting and feeling my way along. This forum has been a great source of information (Thank you!), so let me ask you to check my thinking on this. I have searched and read previous posts on this topic, but I'm still looking for some input.
My wife expressed an interest in shooting, so I took her out to the range and let her shoot my gun. (It's an old 16ga Remington 11-48 long-recoil autoloader in which I shoot 1 oz, 1200 fps loads.) She enjoyed it, but the gun pounded and bruised her. So I'd like to find a shotgun she can shoot that would have the least possible recoil. And I'd like to keep it in the $600-$700 range. The ultimate decision would be made by her after at least hefting a few, but I'm looking for a place to start. This would be for very casual use--I'm guessing about 300 rounds in a year.
I'm thinking a 20ga gas gun with 7/8 oz loads would be about the best we could do. I've researched, and the ones making my short list are Remington 11-87 and Mossberg SA-20. I lean towards the 11-87 because it's heavier, it has a shorter LOP (14 vs. 14.5), and it appears to have a thicker, cushier pad (although I haven't actually seen one in person). She's 5'9", so shouldn't need a compact model. I understand the importance of a good fit and am willing to have the stock modified, pad installed if necessary.
Just recently, however, I noticed that Winchester makes low recoil 20ga load in their AA line (7/8 oz at 980 fps). I'm *guessing* an autoloader is unlikely to cycle that reliably, but I'm wondering if a budget O/U (CZ Drake or similar) shooting that shell would actually have less recoil than the gas autoloader with the faster load.
I'd welcome your input--on both the 11-87 vs. SA-20 and on the O/U with low recoil shells.
Thanks
My wife expressed an interest in shooting, so I took her out to the range and let her shoot my gun. (It's an old 16ga Remington 11-48 long-recoil autoloader in which I shoot 1 oz, 1200 fps loads.) She enjoyed it, but the gun pounded and bruised her. So I'd like to find a shotgun she can shoot that would have the least possible recoil. And I'd like to keep it in the $600-$700 range. The ultimate decision would be made by her after at least hefting a few, but I'm looking for a place to start. This would be for very casual use--I'm guessing about 300 rounds in a year.
I'm thinking a 20ga gas gun with 7/8 oz loads would be about the best we could do. I've researched, and the ones making my short list are Remington 11-87 and Mossberg SA-20. I lean towards the 11-87 because it's heavier, it has a shorter LOP (14 vs. 14.5), and it appears to have a thicker, cushier pad (although I haven't actually seen one in person). She's 5'9", so shouldn't need a compact model. I understand the importance of a good fit and am willing to have the stock modified, pad installed if necessary.
Just recently, however, I noticed that Winchester makes low recoil 20ga load in their AA line (7/8 oz at 980 fps). I'm *guessing* an autoloader is unlikely to cycle that reliably, but I'm wondering if a budget O/U (CZ Drake or similar) shooting that shell would actually have less recoil than the gas autoloader with the faster load.
I'd welcome your input--on both the 11-87 vs. SA-20 and on the O/U with low recoil shells.
Thanks