Its less than lethal , still lethal. I think it would be best if a less than lethal then the rest whatever you want.They put tails on bean bans now so they fly straighter.
Hiding in the corner and wimpering.. assuming the intruder is only the tooth fairy, any other intruder might be lethal.Non-Lethal Alternatives?
I emphatically concur!!!! I would also like to make a few other points. You are either justified to use deadly force or you aren't. Using a less lethal round first isn't going to change that at all. In fact, SCOTUS has ruled if the requirements for the use of lethal force are met that there is no obligation to use a less lethal alternative even if it is available. In fact, in most home defense situations, I would argue that if you took the time to deploy a less lethal round first then maybe you weren't in a truly deadly force situation. You would have been better served by using that time to escape.aaron_c said:do not understand why you would use less lethal ammo, i dont want to kill anyone but if there is an offender in my house i am prety sure he wont have rubber rounds in his pistol, from my point of view rubber rounds are pointless, they are a waste of money as they cost more and will probably get you killed.