Joined
·
2,769 Posts
That could be factor in Remington's decision to move and where it moves.Will the new factory have a union?
That could be factor in Remington's decision to move and where it moves.Will the new factory have a union?
My career has moved me from sea to shining sea and border to border. I am back in FL because the company closed my plant in GA and offered FL or severance.True- but how would you feel if your employer said they were moving across the country because they didn’t believe with the current state’s laws? A lot gets impacted with something like that, but sometimes it is still necessary.
Yep, some people move all the time for their jobs. Most people would prefer if they did not have to, though.My career has moved me from sea to shining sea and border to border. I am back in FL because the company closed my plant in GA and offered FL or severance.
Fortunately FL is my ancestral home.
I never saw a union job where dues were $800 a month. You?Before or after dues are paid?
I have never had any taken out of my check, and no one has shown me a check with union dues that high.I never saw a union job where dues were $800 a month. You?
Move ahead a century.Yeah....we don't want those companies to have to pay a single dime more than they have to pay to those greedy workers. I mean....we would all rather have guns built by minimum wagers rather than to have guns built by someone making $25-$30 an hour who actually gave a rats a$$ about the guns they were building.
Everyone complains about greedy corporations taking advantage of tax breaks and corporate welfare, but God forbid we let workers organize to protect themselves from abuse and low wages offered by those same greedy corporations.
According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, union workers make $200 more per week than non union workers. We can't have that now can we??
It happens all the time...happened to me a few times. That is the work environment of today.True- but how would you feel if your employer said they were moving across the country because they didn’t believe with the current state’s laws? A lot gets impacted with something like that, but sometimes it is still necessary.
Nah, you're right, Gordon Gecko. Companies really just want friends for their products. That's how they make most decisions, emotions and stuff they read on facebook. They called Georgia and asked if their guns could come over for a play date, because they were having a lot of trouble fitting in. Georgia just threw 28 million dollars of corporate welfare at Remington and also is paying to train the workers because they are so friendly, but Remington was totally going to move there anyway because that's what friends are for. Probably Georgia and guns are gonna get married when they grow up.Is this what your company does?
Or are you just the accountant for these corporations that you know so much about?
Your opinion isn't supported by the facts. You may not like unions for your own reasons. But the reason you've stated is false. So you'll need to reposition your argument.Move ahead a century.
Good companies realize that competitive total compensation and safety on the job will result in better profits (that nasty word-sarcasm). But unions that want to have five people ( dues payers) for a three person job, and weeks of sick pay that are really paid time off and often not for any sickness, and support the incompetent, under performing worker are dinosaurs.
The end customer pays for union bs and how they bully and strong arm. I worked for a company who was bought by Bosch and about 5 years later management laid the law on job classes (5 people doing the work of 2) and hospitalization insurance (unitize with the salary program). The union was unwilling to budge and voted themselves out of a job. Not the smartest.Your opinion isn't supported by the facts. You may not like unions for your own reasons. But the reason you've stated is false. So you'll need to reposition your argument.
.The Union Advantage | U.S. Department of Labor
www.dol.gov
Edit:. If a company allows 5 workers to do the work of 3....is that a union shortcoming or is it the result of bad company management who sent a bunch of inept negotiators who either ignored or lacked the data to negotiate a contract.?? The union negotiated to it's best position. Is it the unions fault if management fails to do the same?? Hardly.
Right to work laws are just nanny-state, big gubmint regulations. There’s no reason for the state to govern private, mutually agreed to contracts between private businesses and private unions, which is what so called right to work laws actually do.GA is a right to work state, which is best for all involved.
Or you need to reposition your argument. If the union thinks that having five people to do the work of three people, they didn’t negotiate its best position. That simply pays money for inefficiency. Eventually the company and union pays for that. I’ll keep my argument.Your opinion isn't supported by the facts. You may not like unions for your own reasons. But the reason you've stated is false. So you'll need to reposition your argument.
.The Union Advantage | U.S. Department of Labor
www.dol.gov
Edit:. If a company allows 5 workers to do the work of 3....is that a union shortcoming or is it the result of bad company management who sent a bunch of inept negotiators who either ignored or lacked the data to negotiate a contract.?? The union negotiated to it's best position. Is it the unions fault if management fails to do the same?? Hardly.
Your problem wasn't a union. Your problem was the people in charge of the union.The end customer pays for union bs and how they bully and strong arm. I worked for a company who was bought by Bosch and about 5 years later management laid the law on job classes (5 people doing the work of 2) and hospitalization insurance (unitize with the salary program). The union was unwilling to budge and voted themselves out of a job. Not the smartest.
And yet you posted an article that says otherwise.
You have yet to refute my original statement. That being that union jobs pay higher wages and higher total compensation than non union jobs. That fact is not even debatable. Yet here you are.^Well... some one obviously doesn't understand the fundamental goings on of where business managers and agents come from.
You need to read it again. Ilion will be history soon enough.And yet you posted an article that says otherwise.
Maybe you posted the wrong article randy. Because this one says they intend to keep making shotguns in ilion and are moving the 700 line out of state. So if your inferring something else you should just state it.You need to read it again. Ilion will be history soon enough.