Shotgun Forum banner

Winchester SX3 vs SX4

15K views 47 replies 16 participants last post by  SHughes  
A few years back Randy Wakeman did a video comparison between the two and pointed out some very obvious differences between the two guns. It’s been a while since I watched it but I seem to recall that he did not like the bolt release on the SX-4, the ergonomics of the stock and the recoil pad compared to the SX-3. There may have been more. His bottom line as I recall was that the SX-4 was a cheapened version of the SX-3. You may want to look up the video and see for yourself
 
  • Like
Reactions: Outdoorsman23
My SX-3 is the Flannigan, (red receiver). It’s an OK gun but certainly not my favorite semi auto among those that I own. One thing that I don’t like is the 28” barrel that it came with. I much prefer the 26”. Also, my gun came with two gas pistons: one for Target loads and one for heavy hunting loads. Did any of you get two with yours? I hear that some came with two and others with only one.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SHughes
I don’t hunt anymore so my Flannigan is relegated to the sporting games. It is absolutely my go to gun in wet weather. The barrel isn’t blued. It has a coating similar to a grey-brown paint. If the gun gets soaked, I don’t care as there is very little if anything to rust. WD40 chases any moisture away from springs and ferrous metal parts.
 
My only disappointment was when the Duratouch went sticky on both my SX-2 and SX-3 and I had to send them in for replacement. What came back in both wasn’t sticky anymore but made me wonder if the new stocks were made by the Matell Toy Company. They serve the purpose but are super cheap and not worthy of the gun