Shotgun Forum banner

All copper shot

2.4K views 49 replies 17 participants last post by  Silver_Is_Money  
#1 ·
Hey guys I have been drooling over all copper shot for a while now but I was wondering if it was any good I think it would be really neat due to the fact that it can be shot through tighter construction, chokes, unlike bismuth and is cheaper then tss and hevi shot and options like steel it is softer witch is good in some applications of course it is hard to beat lead in cost and takedown effectiveness but some places you cannot shoot lead so I was wondering if copper is any good and do you need non-tox wads to throw copper down range or will standard target wads do?
 
#2 · (Edited)

This fella Koshyk has promoted pure copper shot in his Darnes in the Uplands.....no idea if he still runs copper but you might search or try to contact him for field experience or purchase availability of copper shot today.
 
#6 ·
Pure Copper shot for waterfowl isn't legal in the USA. It needs a special coating and a special fluorescent marker applied to make it legal. Don't get caught waterfowl hunting in the USA with EU/UK approved pure copper shot unless you are willing to face fines and confiscation. See post #4 (and on into that thread). No manufacturer is currently willing to specially coat and fluorescent mark copper shot, so despite being legal it may never be available.
 
#7 · (Edited)
Looking at the Thomas J. Glover 'Pocket Reference', I see the density of pure copper is 8.96 gm/cm3. I would think 'legal' copper shot would be roughly the same, but that might not be the case. Iron shot is spec'd at 7.86 gm/cm3. You'd have a ballistic advantage over steel shot, but as has been pointed out, legal copper shot is 'unobtanium'. I wonder what this shot would cost if actually available.
 
#24 ·
The corrosion inhibited and fluorescent marked Copper shot that was tested and achieved approval for waterfowl hunting in the USA weighed in at 8.94 g/CC as to density, indicating that the coatings very minimally reduce the density.
 
#8 ·
Yo

You shouldn’t need steel wads for copper shot, B&P used to sell a duplex blend, some state side, most in Europe. The concept went away about 5-6years ago, but I’ve referenced it a few times on other forums as a hevi shot substitute (hard shot patterns tight, energy of the shot is greater than steel, thus a smaller pellet should be as effective or more effective than slightly larger steel, think steel 2’s compared to copper 3’s) close to bismuth in density.
Image
 
#12 ·
I don't know the reasoning, but this is the regulation and the approved list (see 6th from the top):

Both a copper corrosion inhibitor and a fluorescent marker (detectable via UV Light) are mandated for legality in the USA.
 
#23 ·
I would imagine that copper shot, isn't a good alternative to lead shot, as steel, bismuth, tungsten, etc. is "Non-Toxic" shot. Copper oxide is highly toxic. Might even be worse than lead as far as toxicity through a bird's digestive system goes. It's weird I know that copper is used for potable water, but it isn't subject to stomach acids. I'm sure that is why it needs to be coated, and why it isn't commonly used.
 
#34 ·
Never heard of a fluorescent coating and I also didn't know that copper was specifically restricted. The regs tell you what you can't use (lead) and then they tell you specifically what is approved for use.
When I was on the job we initially carried magnets to check for steel shot. Then when bismuth, etc. came into use, we had a little electronic device that you dropped a shell into. The device wouldn't tell you what was in the shell but it would tell you that it wasn't lead.
 
#40 ·
I'm one of the poor souls (both figuratively and financially) that went from lead to steel shot. So, I never really worried about how the feds would check my shells- a simple magnet was all they need for my shells. If I was shooting bismuth, tungsten or other high dollar stuff, I probably would have done some research like you did.

I just have to be careful to not pull the old lead shells out of storage when I'm going hunting. I didn't toss them and won't but probably should put them in a separate storage area.
 
#41 ·
I'm one of the poor souls (both figuratively and financially) that went from lead to steel shot. So, I never really worried about how the feds would check my shells- a simple magnet was all they need for my shells. If I was shooting bismuth, tungsten or other high dollar stuff, I probably would have done some research like you did.

I just have to be careful to not pull the old lead shells out of storage when I'm going hunting. I didn't toss them and won't but probably should put them in a separate storage area.
Yah, I usually had my kids with me and handloaded heavyweight stuff, in regular looking unlabeled hulls, so I didn't want a warden hassling me due to their crappy test equipment ;) Never needed it so far, but nice to have--run ins with confusion and uncertainty and law enforcement, never a winning combo.
 
#46 ·
If anyone is following along, Boss is working on/developing a new shot material that should be less influenced by supply chain issues from foreign countries.

The owner has not come out and said directly what the shot is, but has had a few podcasts and videos on social media testing the shot type.


I’m guessing it’s a copper shot. I know a few other smaller ammo companies have tested shot types comparable to ITX-10 in the past few years.

Interesting to see what comes from this.
 
#49 ·
Yup, the shot is lawful, but Boss needs to have a field detection device approved by the Fed's. They're waiting 4 to 6 months for the approval. The head Boss guy cooked one up in short order, but approval isn't so speedy. Apparently the fluorescent thing is proprietary and Boss can't use that shot process. Keep in mind that the density of pure copper is 8.96 gram/cm3. Six percent tin in Bismuth is 9.6. But copper can be annealed to make it quite soft if desired and it out won't fracture.