As clean as factory AA and STS in 28g.

 

My experience with it has been good, as stated above my bores are very "clean" compared to other powders. I have also noticed that it meters very well, very consistent powder drops.

 

I loaded up some 20 ga. 7/8 oz. loads using 20/28 and was pleased with it. It metered well and shot clean enough for me. I am a fan so far.

 

But does it wear the hulls out faster?

 

One note on 20/28. You cannot load Remington 28Ga hulls much past 1,200 since they have a higher chamber pressure then AAHS hulls. If this doesn't bother you great. Personally I only load AAHS in 28ga and .410. As for the performance it's just fine and very clean. Much better to me than longshot and cheaper to boot.

 

I am thinking of doing the same thing. I notice the Unique is not that clean burning. Glad you asked the question

 

20/28 is cleaner than Unique at similar performance levels.

 

Started out loading 20/28 so no comparisons but believe it is excellent powder for the same reasons listed.
My experiences with hull life are good, not uncommon to get 15+ reloads with the 20, some times the 28s a little less.

Tom

 

It does a good job and is clean. I have used it for 20 and 28 gauge loads back when there was a shortage of everything and I could not get longshot. With that being said I feel like longshot gives a little better performance, especially on the distance clays with 28ga.

Since I shoot O/U's a little residue is not an issue. Longshot patterns well in my gun, I have not patterned 20/28 so YMMV.

Can't say I noticed any difference in hull life for AAhs or Rem's between the powders.

I would not hesitate to use it again,but only if longshot was not available or a semiauto came to live with me again!

Good Luck!