Shotgun Forum banner

Gun Magazines/Reviews

507 views 5 replies 6 participants last post by  pumpgun  
#1 ·
I just finished watching Guns and Ammo TV. As always, their last segment was the unbelievably lame "Torture Test" where they abuse some firearm by: dropping it in the mud and running over it with a jeep, barbequing it, curing it in cement, then chipping it out, etc. I hate that part of the show.

It got me to thinking though. If the firearm they chose, failed to function; would they show the segment? I also got to thinking, have I ever read a really bad review of a firearm in a gun magazine? Oh I've read minor criticisms here and there. This gun would be better if...or I didn't care for...but I don't think I've ever read a review that ended, "save your money, this is a piece of sh%t!"

The most negative reviews always seem to end on a positive note, something like: "While there are better values out there, this is a good, reliable handgun." or "Although I was annoyed when the rear sight fell off, the pistol still function relatively reliably..." Car magazines don't do this. If they don't like a car or truck...they say so!

The December issues of most gun mags include the wish lists of their readers. Things like, "What I'd like to see is a Ruger Flattop chambered in .416 Rigby; it'd be just the ticket for California boar hunting in thick cover." Here's my wish. Give us honest evaluations of the guns you test. I'm tired of reading paid endorsements that pretend to be objective testing and critique.
 
#4 ·
I used to subscribe to several mags. I don't anymore. I do get the NRA Rifleman , but it has gotten to be all political and advertising, it sure ain't the old Rifleman. A lot of the gun rags have the attitude of " I haven't met a gun or scope I didn't like" As Nick_PCTEC sorta said,, follow the money!!!!
 
#5 ·
I have never seen a negative review in any magazine about any gun. It is all about the magazine. I usually read the reviews and then read them again to see what is really wrong. Normally, if you see them talking about how great a certain part or parts are, I look for the parts that aren't mentioned.

It is all about the buck and who pays the bills. Oh, the only magazines I subscribe to anymore are Gun Dog, and Preditor and Prey, if that tells you anything.

Doug Gordon
 
#6 ·
You can glean some useful info by reading between the lines... sort of. For example if they're testing a compact pistol that gets 6 inch groups at 15 yards, you'll probably read something like "acceptable for a firearm with this intended purpose, and price range" Same for a cheap SxS that one barrel throws a pattern two feet to the left at 20 yards. In general though, these gun "tests" are basically meaningless, because they're only sampling one specimen for each review. Same for Gun Tests magazine, which claims not to accept handouts for advertizing, n=1=BS. You're better off hanging around a shooting club, talking to people, and seeing what they're shooting.
Then there's the completely absurd. Most of us probably have no interest in the "new and improved" .300 SuperDuperUltra Mag, with its 3600 fps muzzle velocity. Or a .50 cal. revolver with 3000 ft./lbs of muzzle energy. Bet I'd get good offhand groups with that sucker :roll: