Shotgun Forum banner

V3 or SX4

53K views 76 replies 27 participants last post by  lossking  
#1 ·
Hi. First post here. I am looking for a new shotgun. I am between the Remington V3 and the new SX4. I know the SX4 has been limited release so far, but comparing the SX3 will do for me.

What are your opinions between the guns? Reliability, cleaning, recoil, cycle speed, etc...

Thank you in advance!
 
#3 ·
Virginian said:
They both seem to work. Which feels best to you, and do you prefer American or Turkish ?
I like them both. As always, I prefer made in the USA. However, I'm wondering what would be best for my usage. I shoot trap, skeet, and rabbits. Maybe 600-700 rounds a year and hunt pheasants and grouse. Is there any difference in how long these guns will hold up?
 
#7 ·
Virginian said:
They both seem to work. Which feels best to you, and do you prefer American or Turkish ?
Which one of these two is made in Turkey?

I am curious just for the sake of knowledge. Not being critical, judgmental, or making a statement.

I own some made in America classics, Belgian Browning, Beretta, and have had top notch Japanese quality guns and currently own a recently manufactured CZ to boot.
 
#10 ·
With the V3, you get the most modern and innovative operating system at this price point, and a gun made in the USA. The downside to the V3 lies in overall weight (compared to the SX4), generic aesthetics, and less lively feel.

The SX4 is merely an updated SX3, using the same old gas system as the Browning Gold/Silver, and the Winchester SX2 and SX3. The updates are all ergonomic. Collectively, these updates make for a slimmer, lighter and livelier gun than the predecessor.

I personally chose the SX4. My local shop had a couple in stock last week, and they just felt great. Compared to the SX3, the A300 and the V3; the SX4 is slimmer, the oversized controls and trigger guard are easier for me to use, and the gun just seems to have more inherent quality and attention to detail than anything else in the price range.

I live out west, hunt upland birds exclusively, and tend to choose light guns that are easier to carry all day and are quick to mount and shoot. If I were a waterfowl hunter, I may have chosen the V3 or Versamax.
 
#11 ·
Degle said:
With the V3, you get the most modern and innovative operating system at this price point, and a gun made in the USA. The downside to the V3 lies in overall weight (compared to the SX4), generic aesthetics, and less lively feel.

The SX4 is merely an updated SX3, using the same old gas system as the Browning Gold/Silver, and the Winchester SX2 and SX3. The updates are all ergonomic. Collectively, these updates make for a slimmer, lighter and livelier gun than the predecessor.

I personally chose the SX4. My local shop had a couple in stock last week, and they just felt great. Compared to the SX3, the A300 and the V3; the SX4 is slimmer, the oversized controls and trigger guard are easier for me to use, and the gun just seems to have more inherent quality and attention to detail than anything else in the price range.

I live out west, hunt upland birds exclusively, and tend to choose light guns that are easier to carry all day and are quick to mount and shoot. If I were a waterfowl hunter, I may have chosen the V3 or Versamax.
I really am in the middle with these two. I am one of those people whom like innovation. I however have been disappointed by the latest and greatest it in the past. How you ask?

New designs need bugs worked out and sometimes by new parts. New parts need to be manufactured (and perfected) and that takes time and patience. (Especially on new products) Often I find that refinement is only found after product success and not in initial products offerings.

I guess after all of that, my two questions are:
1.) Given the SX4 is more refined, how good is its relatively dated (1990's) gas system?
2.) Did Remington get it right on the first try?
3.) Which is more gun for the money?

I don't have money to purchase these things regularly... Just trying to make the $$$ count and get it right. It may come down to the old mattress test of "just tell me what feels right"... lol
 
#14 ·
Sobrepuesta said:
Virginian said:
Assembled does not equal "Made", does it ?
So now you're saying that the SX4 is made of Turkish parts? What % of it? Do you have inside knowledge of FN Herstal's parts sourcing for the Maxus and SX4?

I bet not.
I went to Winchester's website and found this about the production of the SX3.

"Super X3 Autoloading Shotgun (SX3).
The Super X3 autoloader is the latest in the line of shotguns having their roots in the original Super X Model One, although mechanically the similarities are very vague compared to the original. The Super X3 action is more directly related to the Super X2 introduced in 1999. Both the Super X2 and the newer Super X3 are made at our partner factory in Belgium, with additional assembly work done in our Portugal plant. In the gun industry "Made in Belgium" quality is legendary -- and you can see it in every part, every fit and every finish of the Winchester Super X3."

http://www.winchesterguns.com/support/f ... tured.html

Don't know about the SX4.
 
#21 ·
Degle said:
I really am in the middle with these two. I am one of those people whom like innovation. I however have been disappointed by the latest and greatest it in the past. How you ask?

New designs need bugs worked out and sometimes by new parts. New parts need to be manufactured (and perfected) and that takes time and patience. (Especially on new
products) Often I find that refinement is only found after product success and not in initial products offerings.

I guess after all of that, my two questions are:
1.) Given the SX4 is more refined, how good is its relatively dated (1990's) gas system?
2.) Did Remington get it right on the first try?
3.) Which is more gun for the money?

I don't have money to purchase these things regularly... Just trying to make the $$$ count and get it right. It may come down to the old mattress test of "just tell me what feels right"... lol
[/quote]

In this case you could say Remington got it right on the first try however it really isn't.. Its the same platform the used on the versa max which came out in 2010. Back then, there were a few bugs which got worked out. everyone who had the original ones got the updated parts as well. They took a lot of time with the V3 so as to come out with the best they could out of the gate.
The beauty is with the lifetime warranty there is nothing to ever worry about. To be honest, I sent my versa max back after 7 years because I had a piston which looked like it was peening. They asked me to send it back at my expense ($20). After a few emails they decided to give me a brand new barrel. Who would do that with an out of warranty gun!
I love my Versa max but must say, the V3 is lighter with a better trigger and is very reliable with very little that can go wrong with many rounds between cleanings.
when I got the versa max, I didn't clean it for over a year shooting a flat a week because the advertised that it could do it...it did with no failures. I cleaned it because I felt bad for it

I have sold my Benelli super vinci and Beretta 391 xtrema2 after owning these 2 remingtons and couldn't be happier...used the extra money to buy a whole bunch of ammo (more than 12 flats)

You will never regret the purchase of a V3...do a google search to see its great reviews for it. Also Randy wakeman has reviewed it on this forum, youtube, his webpage. They sell out fast around here and stores cant keep them on the shelves.

I chose the camo for the extra layer of protection against weather and scratches which was more important than the look of wood for me.
 
#25 ·
RandyWakeman said:
Maniac01 said:
Remington V3 and the new SX4.

The SX4 is not a disaster, but with a heavy trigger, weak feeding, no warranty, etc., it is a very hard shotgun to love.
Did the Browning guy say when the Citori CXT would be available?