Shotgun Forum banner

Winchester/Olin Military 00 Buckshot Compared (Pic Heavy)

57K views 54 replies 25 participants last post by  Carbonstorm  
#1 ·
I posted this over on ar15.com, but I figured you guys would appreciate it as well. :)

Since AR15fan's excellent post has been lost to the archives, I decided to post more information about the Winchester "Military" 00 Buckshot that is on the market.

Many retailers talk about how great this buckshot is because "Its Mil-Spec so it has to be good". Since the proof is in the pudding.... lets find out.

Image


The 2 loads I'm comparing this buckshot to is the cheap Winchester Super-X 00 buckshot that can be found virtually everywhere that sells shotgun shells, and the great Federal Vital-Shok. The Winchester Super-X is very cheap as you can usually find the 15 round Value-Packs at Wal-Mart for $10. The Federal Vital-Shok is Federal's top-of-the-line 00 buckshot, and it shows in quality & price. A box of Vital-Shok usually runs about $5.60-$7.00 a box locally.

Image


As we see here, all the loads have the familiar star crimp. The Winchester shells look exactly the same except for coloration. You will also notice that the Vital-Shok shell has a dip in the crimp. This is because it was kept in a loaded 870 for about a year. Shells will deform in your magazine tube, so be sure to switch them out occasionally (I usually change out every year).

Now on the the main course:

We will start with the Federal Vital-Shok 00 Buckshot

Image


The Vital-Shok is very well made. It has a plastic shot cup, plastic wad, sand-like buffering, and the pellets are copper plated. Before the Flite-Control wad came about, this has always been the best patterning 00 buckshot in every shotgun I've owned. This is a quality load because it has about everything you can do to get a tight pattern with buckshot.

Image


I'm also using Bob Brister's method of using a pair of Channelocks to test how hard the lead really is. (More on this later in the thread).

Now lets see how the Winchester Military 00 Buckshot compares:

Image


Not good at all. There is buffering (much larger than the Federal), but it has unplated shot & no shot cup. Just a couple of cardboard wads, and a plastic disk covering the powder. This will lead to horrible patterns compared to a premium load like the Vital-Shok. Very disappointing, and really not all that "High-Speed, Low-Drag". Its also made very cheaply, which means its not worth the premium some retailers are selling it at.

Now lets compare it (and the Vital-Shok) to the common Winchester Super-X 00 Buckshot:

Image


Wow........ its made EXACTLY like the Military 00 buckshot except not in OD green. Literally, its exactly the same on the inside. The uber-cool Military 00 buckshot has the same internal components as the plain jane Super-X 00 buckshot which is dirt cheap and available all year around.

Well, lets check Brister's method of checking how hard the pellets really are:

Image


The Super-X & Military Buckshot are pretty soft. The Federal is very hard, and patterns will be much smaller compared to unplated buckshot.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

So surprisingly it appears that the Military buckshot is literally Super-X buckshot with a OD shell body, and blackened brass. I could have sworn that the Super-X line used to have a plastic shot cup a few years ago, but it appears Winchester has cheapened it even further. If you are wanting a cheap 00 buckshot load, I'd look at the Remington Express 00 buckshot since Remington still uses the Power-Plus Wad. I've usually had better patterns with it over the Super-X over the years.

The Bottom Line

* The cool Military buckshot is literally Super-X that you can buy at your local sporting goods store throughout the year. Same components & same construction. If you are paying a penny more for the Military buckshot, you are being ripped off.
 
#3 ·
I thought I had found plastic shot cups on the ground after shooting the Super X bu the ones I have are pretty old and didn't come from a 15rd pack. I also may just need to step away from the crack pipe. When I tested them I got a little bit tighter and more regular patterns from the Super X than I did from the green ones. Unfortunately I didn't have my camera when I shot the green stuff as it was an impromptu "hey let's shoot this stuff". The military stuff also recoiled a little more than the Super X that I have. Perhaps the slightly better patterns are from a lower velocity. Perhaps I still need to step away from the crack pipe.

Thanks for the comparison. Very informative.
 
#6 ·
I bought a box of that military stuff buckshot once to see how it did, but unfortunately I never got to test it because me and my bro used it (along with several boxes of #4 buck) to kill fruit and cheap canned baked beans. But I will say it is a huge ripoff. I can buy a box of Federal powershok buck (appears the same as as vital shok, but not plated) for $4.60, or a box of the military stuff for $5.50. It seems your paying for the "coolness" of mil-spec camo ammo.
 
#8 ·
thanks for that info i have been eye balling those mill spec shells.
so you recommend rem express 00 buck for a cheap round for practice and even HD maybe
what would you guys recommend for a premium 00 buck round for the ultimate HD and doomsday round, something you could trust your life to and go to combat with?
 
#14 ·
I've also did a comparison on ar15.com of the Remington Express since its my favorite "cheap" 00 buckshot load. Plus I was curious if Remington has cheapened it like Winchester did the Super-X line.

Remington has always advertised that their 00 buckshot has carried the Power Piston Wad, but the other Express buckshot loads have not (#4, #1, #0).

However since Winchester has cheapened the Super-X line, lets see if Remington has done the same to the Express line. Plus since they updated their website, it doesn't say anything about the Power Piston wad anymore. This was bought a couple months ago, so its still new production.

Image


Nope, it seems that Remington has still kept their Power Piston Wad, buffering, and their crimp is much harder to open compared to the Winchester. Of course, the lead is unplated.

Image


The lead is softer than the Federal, but it was a bit harder to crush compared to the Super-X.

Since the Remington Express usually sells for $1 more per Value Pack than Super-X, I'd be more inclined to buy it instead for cheap 00 buckshot. I've found it patterns better than Super-X..... not much better, but enough to justify the added expense.
 
#15 ·
Old_Painless said:
Well done.

Just as expected.
Thanks O_P.

Even though my presentation is far behind your level of excellence.
 
#16 ·
Thanks for this, you spared me the expense of testing out the winchester military stuff. Strange thing is the Super X stuff patterns tighter than the remington in my 870, 500 and 930. The hulls are weaker as you mentioned. In my new 930 with a new choate extension they would crimp along the edge of the hull and place a slight cant on the shell making them hard to feed manually.

I will be testing and patterning again this weekend.

Your presentation was awesome. Is that a tactical paper towel?
 
#18 ·
I just realized: you have to dispose of that powder from those shells! Here's what I did. I put powder from one shell on a piece of aluminum foil, and set that in the bathroom sink. My cat got curious and decided to watch from the counter next the sink. I put a match to it, the powder burns in a huge fast bright flame, burning a hole hough the foil and absolutely scaring the **** out of my cat (he still is a very brave cat though). Have fun!
 
#20 ·
As I understand it, premium Buckshot that sits in a shot cup is not "00" at all but actually the next smaller size, "0" so that it will still fit in the shell because the sleeve of the shot cup takes up a little more room.

Everything is a trade off.
 
#21 ·
sjohnny said:
The military stuff also recoiled a little more than the Super X that I have. Perhaps the slightly better patterns are from a lower velocity. Perhaps I still need to step away from the crack pipe.
They both contained the same type of powder, but I don't have a powder scale since I don't reload. :oops: So I couldn't measure it accurately, just had to eyeball it.

However, they are both listed at 1,325FPS so I would imagine the amount of powder should be the same.
 
#23 ·
cmug870 said:
Was the 15 pack one that you got from Walmart or from another source?
Yes

There are other retailers that carry the 15 shell pack, but its mostly a Wal-Mart thing.
 
#24 ·
I ask because I was thinking that the shells might be made that way for Walmart to meet a price point. Like their bulk pack Winchester birdshot. Maybe a 5 pack at another store would actually have a wad. I have seen the 15 pack of 00 Winchester at other stores and wonder if they are different. I usually get my slugs (cheapest Winchester) from Walmart because they are cheap and I just shoot them informally so now I am wondering if they are the same as ones I have gotten elsewhere. For the slugs, I really don't care because I think for me it is all the same for target shooting in the desert. I blindly just get either Federal or Hornady buckshot for the flite control wads so I am just wondering aloud.
 
#25 ·
I would say its very unlikely that the Wal-Mart 15-round packs are special run with cardboard wads, especially since this Military buckshot is using the same stuff. Plus Winchester shells are notorious for using cheaper components.

Since Super-X is the "Value Line" of Winchester ammo, I imagine they are just using plastic shotcups on the Supreme, Ranger, and AA shells these days.
 
#26 ·
i was watching Lock N Load on the history channel and they had a shotgun special. towards the end of the episode they went to an army fort and they were using a mossberg 500 and a benelli semi auto (i forget the model) and they were sadly using those Winchester Mill spec rounds
(as i could tell by the color)